in equation (5) is
   given by convergence of
   net radiative heat flux which is calculated by using radiative
   transfer equation.
We consider following radiation processes in this model; absorption of
   near infrared solar radiation (NIR), absorption and emission of
   infrared radiation associated with atmospheric
   CO
, absorption and scattering of solar
   radiation, and absorption and emission of infrared radiation
   associated with dust.
 is represented as follows.
| (22) | 
Both infrared and near infrared radiative flux associated with
   CO
 are calculated by Goody narrow band
   model (c.f., Goody and Young, 1989).
In calculating infrared radiative flux, CO
   15 
m band is only considered.
The upward and downward infrared radiative flux 
   
   and the infrared radiative heating rate per unit mass 
   
 are calculated as follows.
 is line strength, 
 is
   square root of the product of line strength and line width and 
   
 
   is the reference value of 
,
   
 is effective path length, and 
 
   is reference pressure (= 1013 hPa).
In calculating near infrared solar radiative flux,
   CO
 4.3 
m, 2.7 
m, and 2.0 
m band are considered.  
The near infrared solar radiative flux 
   
 and 
 are calculated as follows.
where 
, 
 is the solar
   zenith angle, and 
 is the solar radiative flux
   per unit wave length at the top of atmosphere which is represented
   as follows.
![]()  | 
(29) | ||
![]()  | 
(30) | 
where 
 is the surface temperature of the sun (=
   5760 K), 
 is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (=
   5.67
 Wm
K
),
   
 is solar constant on the mean radius of Mars orbit
   (= 591 Wm
), 
 and 
   is the radius of Mars orbit and its mean
   value, 
 is solar
   radiative flux at the top of atmosphere.
 is depend on season, latitude and local time.
Detail descriptions of 
 and 
 are
   shown in 第5.3節.
The transmission function averaged over 
 in near
   infrared wavelength region is similar to that in infrared
   wavelength region except for the effective path length 
.
The number of narrow band and its band width are similar to those of
   Savijärvi (1991a).
The line strength and the square root of the
   product of line strength and line width are quoted from
   those at 220 K listed by Houghton (1986).
These vaues are listed in Table 4 
 Table 7.
CO
 15 
m band ranges from 500
   cm
 to 900 cm
 and 4.3 
m band ranges from
   2200 cm
 to 2450 cm
, where 
   is equal to 25 cm
.
CO
 2.7 
m band ranges from 3150
   cm
 to 4100 cm
 and 4.0 
m band ranges from
   4600 cm
 to 5400 cm
 , where 
   
 is equal to 100 cm
.
| 512.5 | 1.952
 | 
2.870
 | 
712.5 | 1.232
 | 
8.387
 | 
| 537.5 | 2.785
 | 
1.215
 | 
737.5 | 2.042
 | 
2.852
 | 
| 562.5 | 5.495
 | 
2.404
 | 
762.5 | 7.278
 | 
6.239
 | 
| 587.5 | 5.331
 | 
1.958
 | 
787.5 | 1.337
 | 
2.765
 | 
| 612.5 | 5.196
 | 
5.804
 | 
812.5 | 3.974
 | 
8.897
 | 
| 637.5 | 7.778
 | 
2.084
 | 
837.5 | 1.280
 | 
3.198
 | 
| 662.5 | 8.746
 | 
7.594
 | 
862.5 | 2.501
 | 
1.506
 | 
| 687.5 | 2.600
 | 
2.635
 | 
887.5 | 3.937
 | 
1.446
 | 
| 2212.5 | 9.504
 | 
2.866
 | 
2337.5 | 5.587
 | 
1.206
 | 
| 2237.5 | 2.217
 | 
3.000
 | 
2362.5 | 6.819
 | 
1.182
 | 
| 2262.5 | 4.566
 | 
1.134
 | 
2387.5 | 1.256
 | 
8.873
 | 
| 2287.5 | 7.965
 | 
2.011
 | 
2412.5 | 7.065
 | 
3.404
 | 
| 2312.5 | 1.055
 | 
5.880
 | 
2437.5 | 8.522
 | 
4.236
 | 
| 3150 | 1.324
 | 
9.836
 | 
3650 | 1.543
 | 
3.245
 | 
| 3250 | 7.731
 | 
4.900
 | 
3750 | 1.649
 | 
2.722
 | 
| 3350 | 1.232
 | 
2.952
 | 
3850 | 1.180
 | 
9.535
 | 
| 3450 | 5.159
 | 
7.639
 | 
3950 | 1.464
 | 
2.601
 | 
| 3550 | 4.299
 | 
1.914
 | 
4050 | 1.251
 | 
2.021
 | 
| 4650 | 2.185
 | 
1.916
 | 
5050 | 8.778
 | 
2.012
 | 
| 4750 | 2.040
 | 
6.475
 | 
5150 | 8.346
 | 
1.804
 | 
| 4850 | 1.197
 | 
3.112
 | 
5250 | 8.518
 | 
8.474
 | 
| 4950 | 4.829
 | 
5.759
 | 
5350 | 4.951
 | 
1.597
 | 
The solar and infrared radiative flux associated with dust are
   calculated by using the 
-Eddington approximation 
   (c.f., Liou, 1980).
The 
-Eddington approximation is well used in calculating
   radiative transfer with anisotropic scattering.
The asymmetry factor of dust for solar and infrared radiation 
   are between 0 and 1 which means forward scattering occurs.
The upward and downward diffuse solar radiative flux per unit wave
   length associated with dust 
, 
   
 
   are obtained as solutions of following
   equations.
The boundary condition of 
   (31) and 
   (32)
   are that 
   at the top
   of atmosphere and 
 
   at the surface, where 
 is the surface albedo.
   are expressed as follows.
where 
 are optical depth, single scattering
   albedo and asymmetry factor scaled by 
-Eddington
   approximation, which are given as follows.
where 
 
   are optical depth, single scattering
   albedo and asymmetry factor, respectively.
The upward and downward infrared radiative flux per unit wave length
   associated with dust are obtained as solutions of similar equations
   used for calculation of diffuse solar flux 
   ((31), (32))
   except for the
   last term in right hand side of each equation.
The boundary condition of 
  (33)
   and (34)
   is that 
 at the top
   of atmosphere and 
 is equal to 
   
 at the surface.
The Plank function 
 in 
   (33)
   and (34) is averaged over the band width.
 are the lower and upper wave length of the
   band.
The radiative heating rate associated with dust is calculated as follows.
    is the direct solar radiative flux per unit wave length, 
| (37) | 
The dust opacity is calculated by using the mass mixing ratio
   and effective radius of dust.
In this model, we suppose that the size distribution of dust particle
   is the modified gamma distribution (Toon et al., 1977).
The monoclomatic optical depth 
 is represented
   by using the extinction coefficient per unit volume 
   
 as follows.
| (41) | 
![]()  | 
(42) | ||
![]()  | 
(43) | 
![]()  | 
(44) | 
The extinction efficiency 
 is defined as
   the ration of extinction cross section to geometric cross section.
| (45) | 
Similarly, 
the scattering efficiency 
 and 
   absorption efficiency 
 is defined as follows.
| (46) | |||
| (47) | 
In this model, the dust opacity is derived from the
   mass mixing ratio of atmospheric dust. 
Given parameters are the cross section weighted mean extinction
   efficiency 
, the single scattering albedo 
   
, the size distribution function of dust
   
, the mode radius 
, the effective (or, cross section
   weighted mean) radius 
, and the density of dust
   particle 
.
 and 
 are defined as
   follows, respectively. 
![]()  | 
(48) | ||
![]()  | 
(49) | 
Supposing that the shape of scattering particle is sphere, 
   the extinction coefficient per unit mass is given as follows.
![]()  | 
|||
![]()  | 
|||
![]()  | 
(50) | 
The values of band width and optical parameters of dust (extinction
   efficiency, single scattering albedo, asymmetry factor) considered
   in this model are following to those of Forget et al. (1999)
   except for 11.6-20 
m band of dust. 
The overlap between visible band of dust and CO
 near infrared band 
   is omitted.
The 5-11.6 
m infrared dust opacity 
 is
   obtained by dividing the visible dust opacity by the visible to
   infrared opacity ratio 
, 
   which is set to be 2. (Forget, 1998).
The 20-200 
m infrared dust opacity is calculated by using 
   
    and the value of 
   shown in Table 8.
| Band( | 
Band(cm | 
 | 
 | 
|
| 0.1-5  | 
2000-10 | 
1.0 | 0.920 | 0.55 | 
| 5-11.6  | 
870-2000 | 0.253 | 0.470 | 0.528 | 
| 20-200  | 
50-500 | 0.166 | 0.370 | 0.362 | 
| Parameters | Standard values | Note | 
| 
 | 
3.04 | Ockert-Bell, et al. (1997) | 
| 
 | 
2 | Forget (1998) | 
| 2.5  | 
Pollack et al. (1979) | |
| 0.4  | 
Pollack et al. (1979) | 
The solar flux at the top of atmosphere 
 is depend on
   season, latitude and local time.
In this section, we show 
 as a function of local time
   at a specified season and latitude.
Suppose that 
 (Wm
) is solar constant on the mean orbital radius
   of Planet, 
 and 
 is the radius of
   orbit and its mean value, 
 is solar zenith
   angle, 
 is latitude, 
 is the solar
   inclination, 
 is the hour angle
   (
, 
 is length of day ). 
 is represented by using these variables as follows.
![]()  | 
(52) | ||
| (53) | 

![]()  | 
(54) | 
| Parameters | Standard values | Note | 
| 20 | 
Pollack et al. (1979) | |
| 100  | 
〃 | |
| 0.093 | ||
| 25.2 | 
||
| 110 | 
Carr (1996), Fig. 1 | |
| 591 Wm |